257

COMMENTS

PRINT

TEXT SIZE:

A A A
As a real estate industry insider over the past several years, but never a broker or a real estate agent, I've always thought most consumers have no idea what it's like to be a real estate agent. We all know that people resent the hell out of real estate agents/brokers and have little respect for them. I mean, to be ranked below actors and union leaders -- that's just harsh.

Real estate is a weird business. It's a major pillar of the American -- nay, global -- economy, as the current malaise shows, and yet so few people understand it.

Buying a home is the biggest financial transaction for the vast majority of Americans, and yet because they do it so infrequently, most consumers don't have a clue about a process that could put them into debt for the rest of their lives. And people's impressions of real estate agents is formed more by movies, TV shows and commercials than reality, because they simply don't interact with them often enough to gain an informed opinion.

Think about it. You see your doctor a few times a year. You see your accountant at least once a year. If you have a lawyer, chances are that you see him or her at least a couple of times a year. You see a real estate agent once every seven years, if you're the average consumer.

The first and most important thing that real estate agents wish you knew about their job is how hard you make it on them.

Otherwise rational, highly intelligent, highly educated people can lose their minds when it comes to their homes. I've heard more than one story of how a Wall Street investment banker, whose day job is to take cold hard looks at companies and put values on them, simply can't accept that his home isn't worth what he thinks it ought to be worth. Why hire an expert, paying them extraordinary amounts of money (5 or 6 percent of a house sale is rather a lot), then ignore their professional advice?

More fundamentally, you don't pay for their time. Real estate may be the last pure commission job left in America -- even retail sales has notions of draw-against-commission. An agent could spend three months and a few hundred hours working for you, showing you house after house, negotiating contracts, working through difficulties, and a hundred other things besides, only to have you change your mind at the last minute and decide to buy somewhere else. The agent made exactly zero dollars from that work. (Someone is going to point out that lawyers work on contingency all the time. True, and they also take 30 percent to 40 percent of the award.)

Real estate is the only "profession" in which the professional owes a fiduciary duty to a client who isn't paying him. All the liability, all the risk, and a relatively small reward (compared to other success-based endeavors) are the hallmarks of real estate. So like venture capital (another high-risk endeavor), real estate agents practice a form of portfolio management: They expect that the vast majority of their deals will fall through, and hope that the one that hits will pay enough to cover the costs of all those that did not. And that, my friends, is why your real estate commissions are so freakin' high: You, the successful buyer or seller, are subsidizing all of those flaky buyers and sellers who had a change of heart, couldn't qualify for financing, had unrealistic expectations, and so on.

To be fair, agents share some blame, too. If they refused to work for free, chances are the industry would have evolved in a different direction. But we are where we are. As we will see in future columns, this particular structure of the industry creates all sorts of interesting effects that real estate agents wish you knew about their job.

But for now: Next time you're in the market to buy or sell a house, and you're thinking about hiring a real estate agent, ask yourself just how serious you are about it. Are you just testing the market to see where your house would sell for? Please try not to waste an agent's time. Are you a buyer, but don't have a clue in which of the 17 nearby towns you might be interested, or what you could actually afford to buy? Try not to think too badly of the real estate agent to whom you represent a whole lot of risk. And when it comes time to pay the piper, understand that you're paying not just for you, but for every buyer and seller who flaked out on that agent.

************************************************

Want to learn more about home buying and home finance? If so, you won't want to miss
our online discussion with industry experts,
"
What Works Now: Smart Moves When Buying a Home,"
created by AOL Real Estate in participation with Bank of America Home Loans.
Sign up for a reminder on AOL Real Estate.
.

Add Your Comment

Tags: house buying tips, real estate agents, realtors

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 13)

1. J Philip Faranda on Monday, Jun 21st at 12:23:PM said...

In truth, it is the same in every industry, except that the costs in real estate are so comparatively astronomical that the numbers astound. Grocery shoppers absorb shoplifting costs; car insurance accounts for fraud; taxes paid cover welfare cheats and governmental waste.

To their credit, good agents do try and screen sincere buyers by asking if they have been pre approved and if they need to sell before buying. The public would be wise to take this line of questioning in stride and answer truthfully, rather than be insulted.

2. baobeiniu17 on Tuesday, Jun 22nd at 08:39:PM said...

house that sells for $250,000 (in CA, that's about average) gets them between $3750 and $7500. Sell a house a month, and you're making decent money. At the height of the real estate boom out here, agents were raking in money hand over fist, as it were.

3. H Shields on Tuesday, Jun 22nd at 08:53:PM said...

pre qualifing a buyer is first 1 step befor showing any property's. Most banks do about 30% of income to cover a 30 year loan. No sence showing $200,000 homes to a $100,000 buyer.

4. hk on Wednesday, Jun 23rd at 12:36:AM said...

I agree with you but one important factor is they can be pre-approved which means nothing. Unless they have a written commitment from the bank, they can still be denied after they received a pre-approval. As an agent, I had a couple who had been pre-approved and we searched for hundreds of hours until we found the house for them. To only find out after being in contract to buy that they were denied because they were illegally in this country and used someone else ss# and did not realize they had to give tax returns to receive the commitment. So pre-approval means nothing in this day and age. Banks need to do something about this.

5. Pam on Tuesday, Jun 22nd at 11:03:PM said...

I'm an agent and anyone that isn't doesn't have a CLUE PERIOD! The article was right on but there is a lot an agent can do to weed out sellers and buyers that are not in the market today while keeping the door open for when they are but that's not a given to making a great living. There is a saying we've all heard and maybe or maybe not agree with that says "Buyers are Liars and Sellers are Yellers" and everyone here that commented negatively is just proving that statement as correct. Also remember we pay all of our social security tax, there is no health insurance, no retirement, no unemployment so that commission pays way more than are way to wealth to be very honest most of us 98% are working poor...Stick that in your hat and smoke it!

6. Ann Bain on Wednesday, Jun 23rd at 12:01:AM said...

So if a realtor sold a house and the commission was $3750. guess how much of that goes in his/her pocket after all expenses. Well I'll tell you. about 1/2. So he/she sure would not make it in California would he/ she.
A Realtor.

7. undrgrndgirl on Wednesday, Jun 23rd at 12:17:AM said...

baobeiniu17, 250,000 for a house in california? where? where i live an average house is 1.5 MILLION...

8. melba bairaktaris on Wednesday, Jun 23rd at 01:22:AM said...

I agree most industries do have to contend with said losses....but working for free, even when someone is pre-qualified...for six months, only to have a friend sell your clients their home, because they no longer can afford to live there, or some other reason etc. is still no comparison to losses from shoplifters or insurance cheats. No one else puts out that kind of time and money in gas, car costs, starbucks, etc to NOT get paid. Realtors deserve every penny they get, even in the "easy deals" (once a year).

9. ashleigh on Wednesday, Jun 23rd at 02:15:AM said...

To H Shields (#3 response above), where in the world do you get the idea that in California, homes sell for $250,000, on average? If it;s a manufactured home or a mobile home, maybe, but MOST real homes sell for well over $600,000 on average... Marin County, Bel Air, Montecito, Santa Barbara County, Beverly Hills, Rancho Santa Fe (in San Diego County), Newport Coast or anywhere along the coastline in Orange County, the AVERAGE home sells for MULTI-MILLIONS!!! What quality of homes in what towns in California are you finding a basic 3 bd/2.5 ba home with a yard for $250k????

10. No Whining Zone on Tuesday, Jun 22nd at 03:11:PM said...

No sympathy from me. At 6% of hundreds of thousands per transaction they get paid well and If they don't like the job, get another one. Most real estate people I know are not professional and probably would not make it in the 'real' work world. My experience is that becoming a realtor is like joining a club. You think your cool just because you are a member. In Boise, out of 3,300 less than 10% sell enough to have a sustainable job!

11. Paula on Tuesday, Jun 22nd at 08:03:PM said...

I agree [SPAMMY URL DELETED]. They make a lot of money to show a few houses and fill out some paperwork.

12. Larry R Martin @hpiink on Wednesday, Jun 23rd at 02:31:AM said...

It is unfortunate that a few folks think it's such a "breeze" to be a Realtor; that we don't deserve the pay, because we just aren't professionals. I especially love the comment about not being able to hold a real job. Such bitter bile; no happiness there!

I've been a full time licensed real estate professional since 1978. What I've consistently experienced in my tenure is, Realtor reputations hang on ignorant rumor spread by a few (very few) buyers and sellers who resent the commissions paid. The perfect example of this ignorance is demonstrated by the citing of 6% commission as if that is a fixed fee. FYI; all commissions are negotiable. My bet is the author wasn't bothering to listen when the maligned Realtor was disclosing this fact to him/her. You get what you pay for. If you paid too much, that's your fault; you needed to do more work before you signed on with the wrong broker/agent.

It is a fact that there are way fewer real estate professionals than the over-abundance of licenses issued. Another fact is, nobody is required to take the first Realtor that comes along. It isn't a mistake that the buyers and sellers that have the worst experiences started down the road with the worst licensees. To avoid bad real estate agent experiences, buyers and sellers are obliged to interview brokers, not agents, brokers; until you find one you're impressed with. Then verify your brokers references. Review his methodology. Talk to several of his clients. Take the time to make sure for your best interests. When you're comfortable with your best choice, hire that broker.

It's a two way relationship. Your broker, by law, owes you the very best representation, fair dealing, full disclosure and loyalty; and you owe your broker the same.

If all parties knew, and adhered to, their respective obligations in a broker/client relationship at the outset, the disappointments will never find footing.

13. Agent on Tuesday, Jun 22nd at 08:20:PM said...

You guys just don't have a clue. Sure it's 6%...did you know that half of that 6% goes to the other agent, which leaves you with 3%, which then gets split in half with your broker, and 10% of your 1 1/2% goes to the company. You tell me, where is the money we are making? $25 to have a sign installed in the yard. Marketing and advertising comes out of your own pocket. You do not get paid an hourly, this is strictly commission. Spending hundreds in gas per month showing properties to more "window shoppers" than serious buyers. Where is the money? I'm closing one on Friday that I will make $87.00 on after everyone else gets their cut, my monthly office fees are $100.00.............hmmmmmmmm we make the big bucks huh? There is a whole lot more to being an agent then just a little paperwork and showing a few houses, believe me. 10-16 hour days with nothing to show for it in most cases.

Maybe you should explore the Real Estate World before you knock it!

14. Cindy on Tuesday, Jun 22nd at 08:20:PM said...

What the article failed to tell, is that 6% is split normally between 2 agents and 2 brokers.... the buying and the listing side... so it may start to sound like a big piece of the pie, but when it really comes down to it, before expenses, it isn't all the money that sounds like it is.

15. jim on Wednesday, Jun 23rd at 05:07:AM said...

I really have to disagree with you. You have no clue, and neither did I. I'm a small business owner for 30 years, and also thought RE agents made way too much, especially when I sold my house for 1.3 mill. Since then, I married a RE agent, and learned a whole lot. They put a lot of hours in, waste time with tire kickers, and oversee the whole deal from financing, inspections, title work etc. They earn every penny.

16. Ryan on Tuesday, Jun 22nd at 08:29:PM said...

I am a REALTOR in the North Houston Area. This comment completely goes in line with the article! YOU have no idea how real estate agents work, or the business works. YOU say only 10% of REALTORS make enough money to survive. That is because it is so hard to make a living as a Realtor that only 10% make it. Of course the rest or the 90% would LOVE to make a living in real estate, but they can't because it's too hard. IF you make a sale, you have a bazillion dollars of fees you have to pay to your broker, mls, state fees, etc,. Most REALTORS loose money each year. MOST realtors sell only 1 or 2 houses a year. EVEN if they made a 10% comm. you do the math. My income is solely based on my income from real estate and I can tell you that if you want to make money at real estate you have to work 24./7- literally. You have to answerer your emails and phone 24 hours a day. WEEKENDs off = ha ha.
\OH and 6% commission- I WISH. That's only IF you get both sides and IF you commission is not cut to get the deal or save the deal. Do me a favor. Walk into a real estate office. Ask any of them how much money they make in a year..(if they don't lie)....then ask them, any of them to show you 100 houses. THEY WILL ALL JUMP into your car. Because they want business. AND they are willing to take a chance at their time and gas and energy for what?.....a chance that you will find a home, NOT back out of buying the home, get your loan closed (impossible these days) and actually go to the closing table. YOU think your job is hard. One more thing. IF you think or anybody else things that a REALTOR'S job is so easy and so much money can be made...why don't you because a Realtor?? pinnaclerealtygroup@yahoo.com

17. Marianne on Tuesday, Jun 22nd at 08:30:PM said...

Try it sometime... First off, a Realtor does NOT make 6% commission. That 6% is split between brokers: 3% to listing side and 3% to selling side. The agent only gets a portion of that 3%. In todays market, the average home price is $150,000, so the agent grosses between $2,250 and $3,150 from that transaction. Transactions are averaging around 3 to 4 months to close. On average a true REALTOR, not a phony balony sales agent spends about 40% of the gross income on advertising, board dues, mls dues, vehicle expenses, insurance, phone expenses, etc.. and has to be on call at least 12 hours per day. Show a few houses and fill out some paperwork??? Are you nuts??? Not only do you have to do know your market area, a true Realtor must also educate the buyer as to area, price, possible return on investment, etc. She must also know how to negotiate the transaction. In Florida, an agent writes the actual contract. It does not go to an attorney for review as in other states. They must also attend every home inspection, keep on top the the mortgage broker, the title company and make sure all deadlines are met according to the contract. So PLEASE, don't make any comments until you have experienced it first hand.

18. Suzy Q on Tuesday, Jun 22nd at 10:08:PM said...

I'm not really that surprised by your answer. Most people feel that way but may I explain where that 6% goes? If there is a co-broke involved and more likely there is (less than 1% of all transactions are double bubbles)3% goes to the co-broke. Out of the remaining 3%, 1.5% goes to the broker. The remaining 1.5% is paid to your agent, the person who did all the work and listened to you whine for 3 or 4 months. From that 1.5% there are huge expenses which must be paid. Not only are there fees and membership dues, e&o insurance, monthly fees, etc. but we pay for the gas and lunches when we were hauling you and your family. There's no reimbursement. If we keep .90% of that 6% the home owner has to pay, we're ecstatic. I'm not complaining; just want you to understand where that 6% does actually go. I love real estate and everything about it. And it's my choice to do this. The person who actually makes out better is your attorney who shuffles some papers around (the paralegal does most of the work) and gets paid anywhere from $700 to $1500. And you probably never meet the attny. until the closing!

19. Renee Mattox on Tuesday, Jun 22nd at 09:17:PM said...

I don't think most consumers realize the liability we take on as realtors when we represent them in the sale or purchase of a home. By the time a transaction is finished, hundreds of pieces of paper will be signed by the client-contracts, addendums, tons of disclosures, hazard reports, escrow instructions, pre lim title reports, loan documents, truth and lending statements and HUD 1 statements etc etc. There are slackers in every profession but I can tell you there are many good agents like myself who explain all of thes things to their clients and make sure they are prepared and knowledgeable about one of the biggest investments in their life. I might also add that I gladly work on commission and love my job- in return, the decent thing for a buyer to do is to pick one agent to work with so that no one's time and effort is wasted. Here in CA, the inventory is low and everything has mulitple offers. Sometimes we have to write many, many offers for a client before one is accepted. A lot of my buyers are first time buyers so do the math... on an 80-100K home, showing homes for months, writing many offers etc. commission being split 4 ways --I might be breaking even considering the time and costs but I know if my clients are happy, they will refer me and use me when the time comes to move up. And PS, I love my job, it's misinformed people like the "no whining" comment that I don't like.

20. Dukie on Tuesday, Jun 22nd at 08:56:PM said...

First of all, the 6% commission (when you can get it) is split between the buyers agent and the sellers agent. Then, of your 3%, you pay your broker anywhere between 50% of that number, or if you're very good, you can pay as little as 20%. Then there are those pesky misc. costs, like $250 per transaction for errors and ommission insurance, office bills that range from $50 per month to over $500. And lest I forget, there are the yearly MLS and state and national organization fees and the local board of realtors fees. Those add up to about $1500 per year. So, still think it's a club for folks that can't get a real job? Why don't you come on over to the "dark side" and play in our elitest atmosphere? Hope you can afford it.

257 Comments / 13 Pages

 

Add your comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog post. First-time comment? Enter your name and e-mail address, and you'll receive an email confirming your comment and issuing you a password. Your name will be displayed with your comment, but your email address will not. To create additional comments, use that same password. Comments may contain up to three live links; line breaks and paragraphs will automatically be converted to HTML.

Poll

Rob Hahn asked, now you get to answer: What is your attitude towards owning a home vs. renting longterm?
Owning a home is still a great way to invest for the long term - it's still at the center of the American Dream9126 (66.2%)
Ownership can be overrated. It's better to rent long term than extend yourself financially just for the sake of owning a home.4659 (33.8%)

Most Popular Stories

Follow Us

Local Homes for Sale